Layering the space

We have looked at the site history and in our performance we would like to show the layers of the Library past. We are looking to do this by possibly building an instalation of materials in the panes of the windows in the Freezone. We have been thinking to day “What if we fill the windows showing the layers building up in the site?” We could use the base as mud, then brick/ rubble(to link with the buildingof the inital site from a common), metal (representing the railway and industry), and incorporate materials for study at the top then to fill the rest with water. This is just an idea. The bottle shows the layering idea on the space in small scale.

The enclosed materials

Renaming the Library.

“A theatrical performance is a physical event occupying a certain space and a certain duration” (McAuley, 1999, 126)

 

As linking to the quote above, our task this week was to rename all the spaces within the library, to how we feel they should be named.  In groups we explored the library, renaming all the group rooms and the shelving, and in my group, we felt that it was appropriate to name each space after a book which already exists, for example, on the second floor with the worth room, we renames this “Trainspotting” (originally a novel by Irvine Welsh) as the panoramic view of Lincoln shows the famous train line which bothers the residents of Lincoln most days with the barrier crossing.

 

Linking this to the development of our performance, I have started to discover spaces within the library I have never set foot before, mainly the third floor (aptly renamed “The Chamber of Secrets”).  I feel it would be interesting to develop a performance based around people finding these smaller places which people often walk past most days and pay no attention too.  Finding a way to point out the minuscule and pointless  may be a difficult task at hand, yet will prove interesting to discover the hidden aspects of the library still waiting to be uncovered.

 

2014-05-14 00.31.01 2014-05-14 00.30.54 2014-05-14 00.30.46

Works cited:

McAuley, Gay (2002), Space In Performance: Making Meaning in Theatre, Theatre Journal, Vol. 52

 

The Freezone

After forming a group with Sophia and Sam, we investigated the library to find a space that really interested us. At first we were really fascinated by the group room on the third floor. We all liked the fact that it conveyed the old brickwork as well as contrasting that with the new plaster and technology. We also liked the fact that there is a window that goes continuously around two walls which created a gallery atmosphere to the space. We liked the idea that people could view our performance through a window as it created a division between the action and the audience.

We looked at Andre Stitt, a site specific  artist and painter. We looked at his performance called SHIFT. In this recording of his performance we were really interested in the seperation of the audience and the performance by the use of the window. It creates that separation but also makes the audience feel like they are watching a exhibition, like the performance is a piece of art that you can see but not touch.

With this in mind, we searched the library further and discovered the Freezone room which is located on the ground floor. It is only used a couple of weeks a year as a book shop, but apart from that it has no use, it is literally just a bit of free space for people to use. As a group, we really liked this space.

freezone

 

 

Like Stitt’s performance space, it has full length windows that allow us as performers to convey the whole performance to the audience with being able to engage the audience but yet keep that separation. With the windows opposing outside space, we will have use of the natural light unlike the space on the third floor, which is why we will be using the Freezone

 

Video-  SHIFT work at the Lab Gallery # 3. 2009. 47th and Lexington Ave, South East Corne: Andre Stitt

Photo- Freezone, 2014, GCW Library:Jessica Spencer

The Point of Preservation.

 

W r a p p i n g … the word was heard everywhere: on the streets, in the shops, when people discussed buying or selling.

The action gradually aqquired the dimension of a ritual.

It became a symbolic act:

Somewhere at the threshold between miserable reality,

Scorn

Contempt,

And

Ridicule

There emerged suddenly

A growing shadow of pathos.

Instinctively, I sensed,

And to be more precise I still do,

An imminent threat to the highest

Spiritual human value.

It was, and still is, necessary to

P r o t e c t it

From destruction,

From time,

From the primitive decrees of the authoritities

From the questioning by the official and slow-

Minded judges.

And thus the decision

To w r a p it up!

To Preserve it!

(Kobialka, 2007, 88)

 

 

There are many intentions behind the decision to actively wrap something up, to keep it hidden from the rest of the world. It could be a surprise, a secret, it could be sleeping, something that withholds shame or a means of pausing time with the use of an outer shell. Tadeusz Kantor introduced the idea of ‘emballages’, which are objects that “performed a double function in life. They protected their contents from destruction or view” (Kobialka, 2007, 88-89). In many ways a libraries function could be considered an emballage, as its main purpose is to store and protect sources of knowledge for other people to encounter and learn from. However, in terms of architecture, the Great Central Library Warehouse has now become an emballage itself through its structure, with the superimposed modern fixtures and architecture providing an extra layer around the building that actively protects and preserves  its heritage, as seen in image 1.

Image 1 – Outside architecture,  Great Central Library Warehouse (2014)

 

Image 1 – Outside architecture,  Great Central Library Warehouse (2014)

 

Through our installation and filmed performance, we intend to bring together the past and present through the notion of preserving them as one object, rather than as individual features from two different time periods. As seen in image 2, the preservation of the human body in this instance helps provide the link between the new and the old, with the material draping from the body towards both the original brickwork and the computer. This physical connection is visually highlighting the combination of the past and present for people who perhaps visit the building regularly for its modern function as a library but never acknowledge the history lying beside its contemporary features. Human labour has always been rooted within this building, whether it was the physical labour of working in a warehouse or the labour of knowledge as carried out today, thus the decision to preserve a human body, not dissimilar to mummification, we felt was an important one in order to represent the past, present and future involvement of working bodies within the space, whether it be physical or intellectual.

Image 2 – The Preservation of a human body, Great Central Library Warehouse (2014).

Image 2 – The Preservation of a human body, Great Central Library Warehouse (2014).

 

“Architecture emancipates us from the embrace of the present and allows us to experience the slow, healing flow of times… [buildings] enable us to see and understand the passing of history, and to participate in time cycles that surpass individual life”.

(Pallasmaa 2005)

Image 3 depicts the use of material to emphasize and attract attention to the original wooden beams that run along the ceiling on the third floor. The invasion of the present space encourages the library user to lose focus of what is in front of them and look up towards the original supports. As mentioned by Pallasmaa, we can understand the passing of history through architecture in one single snapshot, in this case through the electrical lighting running along the wooden beams. The intention is to have material running right the way along one beam, bringing the spectators attention the other exposed beams in the room in order for them to predict what is underneath.

Image 3 – Preservation of original features, Great Central Library Warehouse (2014).

Image 3 – Preservation of original features, Great Central Library Warehouse (2014).

 

Sometimes it just takes the preservation of one object to spark intrigue in its surroundings.

 

Works Cited

Kobialka, M. (2007) Tadeusz Kantor: Collector and historian. Performance Research: A Journal of the Performing Arts, 12(4) 78-96.

Pallasmaa, J. (2005) The Eyes of the Skin: Architecture and The Senses, Chichester: Wiley

Order in the Chaos

260.
790.
463.
468.
824.
623.
381.
008.
444.
373.
638.
546.
164.
332.
868.
687.
148.
218.
741.
851.
266.
655.
350.
377.
314.
288.
564.
795.
703.
855.

These are my first batch of numbers; they were generated with a random number generation engine on the website http://www.random.org/, from a set of numbers 0 to 999. From them, I discern category. Having decided on category, I will pick out the first book numerically from each of said category – i.e. the first three digits of it’s Dewey decimal reference being from the list above, followed by the numbers .001, rounding upwards as necessary; in the event of a category being discontinued the number will be ignored and struck-through on the list. From these books I will transcribe verbatim the first page of the first chapter and the final page of the final chapter of the book. In this way, I source the raw material for the gospel. By creating the gospel, I create meaning. By creating meaning from random information, I search for order in the chaos.

This is my design.

Poncho Del La Cortez, Dean Librarian of the Psychedelic Monks of Saint Lawrence.